Sometimes, the circumstances surrounding an accident make it clear who should be expected to shoulder the blame. Yet that is not always the case. Consequently, a plaintiff might need to learn what approach to use, when seeking to blame the opposing party, as per personal Injury Lawyer in Belleville.
Questions to be answered
• Who was careless?
• Who had gone into an area in which he or she did not belong?
• Had any laws been violated by those that are allegedly responsible for the accident?
• At the time of the accident, was the responsible driver carrying out a task that had been assigned to him or her by an employer?
Sources of official support for one or more of the plaintiff’s allegations
Police reports: The report does not have to state that one of the involved drivers should be blamed for the accident. Any mention of behavior that exemplifies carelessness, or any mention of the violation of the traffic code can provide the plaintiff with added support.
Another source would be a document in the library or at the police headquarters that provided details on the state’s vehicle code. It could be that the other party had violated an overlooked traffic code. For instance, all motor vehicles need to be inspected every few months. Following the inspection, the inspected vehicle gets a sticker on the front window.
Perhaps some motorist had not bothered to follow law, regarding inspections. Suppose that he had chosen to drive around without a proper sticker, and then had hit the plaintiff in a given case. The plaintiff could prove that the other party had violated some aspect of the vehicle code.
Was there a no-doubt liability linked to the other party’s actions? For example, had the defendant been charged with causing a rear end collision? Only in rare cases, can the driver that has come up from the rear and has hit the approached vehicle get excused from the blame for a rear end collision.
Alternatively, it could be that the accident had taken place at an intersection, and the defendant had been attempting a left-hand turn. Impatience could push a driver to do something foolish, when making a left-hand turn. For instance, it could be that the driver had failed to wait for the plaintiff to pass the green light, and had turned left into the plaintiff’s lane. That would be an example of no-doubt liability on the part of the defendant.
Alternately, it could be that the defendant’s impatience had pushed him to turn left from a lane that was meant for drivers that were headed straight. That would be another example of behavior that could force a driver to perform acts with no-doubt liability.